QuaiWhale logo
QuaiWhale
← Back to mining behaviorOpen entity
Miner intelligence

Mining behavior profile

0x006c65b3fa9b5d5a7114f13ce2bda87ee8a69bf4

Compare retention and redistribution evidence across multiple windows. All classifications remain provisional until validated by a human analyst.

Validation statusValidation blocked4 satisfied · 1 pending · 1 blocked
Current assessment

Miner or pool

Mining evidence exists, but the distribution pattern is not decisive.

Decision readiness
Continue observation
High confidence
Why this assessment
Stable behavior
The classification is consistent across all available windows.
Complete coverage
3 of 3 available windows have complete coverage.
3 observation windows
The 24h, 7d, and 30d windows are available.
Strong reward evidence
22,977 rewards were observed in the strongest available window.
Next validation

Observe redistribution ratio, outgoing transfers, and beneficiary breadth until the distribution pattern becomes decisive.

This recommendation supports analyst workflow only. It does not automatically promote the address to a trusted entity.
Validation workflow

Deterministic analyst checklist

Review the remaining deterministic checks before promoting this provisional mining interpretation to a trusted entity.

4 satisfied1 pending1 blocked
Next analyst action
Blockedcritical priority

Complete human analyst validation

Human validation remains pending until the deterministic readiness checks are satisfied.

Review highlighted check

  • Complete human analyst validation

    critical

    Human validation remains pending until the deterministic readiness checks are satisfied.

    Blocked

  • Confirm distribution pattern

    high

    Continue observing redistribution, outgoing transfers, and beneficiary breadth until the pattern becomes decisive.

    Pending

  • Confirm complete coverage

    critical

    All available aggregation windows are complete and the latest 24h window is covered.

    Satisfied

  • Confirm canonical reward depth

    high

    The strongest available window contains meaningful canonical reward evidence.

    Satisfied

  • Confirm multi-window stability

    high

    The classification is consistent across every comparable aggregation transition.

    Satisfied

  • Reach high interpretation confidence

    medium

    Coverage, stability, observation depth, and reward evidence meet the high-confidence threshold.

    Satisfied

Checklist status is generated from cached metrics and deterministic rules. Human validation remains mandatory before trusted-entity promotion.

Behavior stability
Stable behavior

The classification is consistent across all available windows.

Stability score
100%
Comparable transitions
2
Changed transitions
0
Interpretation confidence

High confidence

Coverage, observation depth, reward evidence, and classification stability strongly support this provisional interpretation.

Confidence score
100%
Coverage
40 / 40
Stability
30 / 30
Observation depth
15 / 15
Reward evidence
15 / 15
Evidence

Deterministic interpretation evidence

7 evidence items
Complete coverage

3 of 3 available windows have complete coverage.

3 observation windows

The 24h, 7d, and 30d windows are available.

Stable behavior

The classification is consistent across all available windows.

Strong reward evidence

22,977 rewards were observed in the strongest available window.

Redistribution decreasing

Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.

Outgoing transfers decreasing

Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.

Beneficiaries decreasing

Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.

Evidence items are generated from cached mining metrics and deterministic comparison rules. Supporting evidence increases interpretability but does not establish real-world identity.

Behavior summary

Deterministic analyst narrative

Rule-based interpretation

This address maintains a miner or pool classification between the 30d baseline and the latest 24h window. Its classification is consistent across the available aggregation windows. Reward redistribution is lower in the recent window than in the longer baseline. Recent distribution activity is contracting across both outgoing transfers and beneficiaries.

This narrative is generated from cached classifications and metric comparisons. It remains provisional and does not establish the real-world identity of the address.

Classification evolution

30d → 7d → 24h interpretation timeline

Provisional transitions
30d → 7d
Unchanged
Miner or pool→Miner or pool
7d → 24h
Unchanged
Miner or pool→Miner or pool

A transition reflects different classifications across aggregation windows. It does not prove that the address changed identity and must remain subject to analyst validation.

Behavior evolution

24h activity versus 30d baseline

Directional comparison
Redistribution
Decreasing
24h 26% · 30d 29%
Rewards
Decreasing
24h 2,825 · 30d 22,977
Outgoing transfers
Decreasing
24h 29 · 30d 506
Beneficiaries
Decreasing
24h 11 · 30d 33

These indicators compare raw values between windows. They describe direction, not statistical significance, and remain provisional when either window is unavailable or incomplete.

24h
24 hour window
Miner or pool
Rewards
2,825
Outgoing
29
Beneficiaries
11
Active buckets
11
Redistributed
26%
Coverage
Complete
Mining evidence exists, but the distribution pattern is not decisive.
Refreshed: 2026-11-01 12:40:05.681837+00:00
Provisional classification
7d
168 hour window
Miner or pool
Rewards
13,522
Outgoing
146
Beneficiaries
17
Active buckets
8
Redistributed
20%
Coverage
Complete
Mining evidence exists, but the distribution pattern is not decisive.
Refreshed: 2026-11-01 12:40:05.683145+00:00
Provisional classification
30d
720 hour window
Miner or pool
Rewards
22,977
Outgoing
506
Beneficiaries
33
Active buckets
31
Redistributed
29%
Coverage
Complete
Mining evidence exists, but the distribution pattern is not decisive.
Refreshed: 2026-11-01 12:40:05.684871+00:00
Provisional classification