QuaiWhale logo
QuaiWhale
← Back to mining behaviorOpen entity
Miner intelligence

Mining behavior profile

0x000e3062d5384781446442e09aa5addf406641af

Compare retention and redistribution evidence across multiple windows. All classifications remain provisional until validated by a human analyst.

Validation statusValidation blocked4 satisfied · 1 pending · 1 blocked
Current assessment

Miner wallet candidate

Most observed rewards appear to remain at the mining address.

Decision readiness
Continue observation
High confidence
Why this assessment
Complete coverage
3 of 3 available windows have complete coverage.
3 observation windows
The 24h, 7d, and 30d windows are available.
Strong reward evidence
11,787 rewards were observed in the strongest available window.
Moderately evolving
The classification changes across part of the observed timeline.
Next validation

Confirm that rewards continue to be retained and beneficiary growth remains limited before analyst promotion.

This recommendation supports analyst workflow only. It does not automatically promote the address to a trusted entity.
Validation workflow

Deterministic analyst checklist

Review the remaining deterministic checks before promoting this provisional mining interpretation to a trusted entity.

4 satisfied1 pending1 blocked
Next analyst action
Blockedcritical priority

Complete human analyst validation

Human validation remains pending until the deterministic readiness checks are satisfied.

Review highlighted check

  • Complete human analyst validation

    critical

    Human validation remains pending until the deterministic readiness checks are satisfied.

    Blocked

  • Confirm multi-window stability

    high

    The classification must remain consistent across additional windows before promotion.

    Pending

  • Confirm complete coverage

    critical

    All available aggregation windows are complete and the latest 24h window is covered.

    Satisfied

  • Confirm canonical reward depth

    high

    The strongest available window contains meaningful canonical reward evidence.

    Satisfied

  • Confirm distribution pattern

    high

    The current distribution pattern is decisive enough for continued analyst validation.

    Satisfied

  • Reach high interpretation confidence

    medium

    Coverage, stability, observation depth, and reward evidence meet the high-confidence threshold.

    Satisfied

Checklist status is generated from cached metrics and deterministic rules. Human validation remains mandatory before trusted-entity promotion.

Behavior stability
Moderately evolving

The classification changes across part of the observed timeline.

Stability score
50%
Comparable transitions
2
Changed transitions
1
Interpretation confidence

High confidence

Coverage, observation depth, reward evidence, and classification stability strongly support this provisional interpretation.

Confidence score
85%
Coverage
40 / 40
Stability
15 / 30
Observation depth
15 / 15
Reward evidence
15 / 15
Evidence

Deterministic interpretation evidence

7 evidence items
Complete coverage

3 of 3 available windows have complete coverage.

3 observation windows

The 24h, 7d, and 30d windows are available.

Moderately evolving

The classification changes across part of the observed timeline.

Strong reward evidence

11,787 rewards were observed in the strongest available window.

Redistribution decreasing

Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.

Outgoing transfers decreasing

Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.

Beneficiaries decreasing

Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.

Evidence items are generated from cached mining metrics and deterministic comparison rules. Supporting evidence increases interpretability but does not establish real-world identity.

Behavior summary

Deterministic analyst narrative

Rule-based interpretation

This address shifts from miner or pool over 30d to miner wallet candidate in the latest 24h window. Its classification changes across part of the observed timeline. Reward redistribution is lower in the recent window than in the longer baseline. Recent distribution activity is contracting across both outgoing transfers and beneficiaries.

This narrative is generated from cached classifications and metric comparisons. It remains provisional and does not establish the real-world identity of the address.

Classification evolution

30d → 7d → 24h interpretation timeline

Provisional transitions
30d → 7d
Classification changed
Miner or pool→Miner wallet candidate
7d → 24h
Unchanged
Miner wallet candidate→Miner wallet candidate

A transition reflects different classifications across aggregation windows. It does not prove that the address changed identity and must remain subject to analyst validation.

Behavior evolution

24h activity versus 30d baseline

Directional comparison
Redistribution
Decreasing
24h 0% · 30d 100%
Rewards
Decreasing
24h 553 · 30d 11,787
Outgoing transfers
Decreasing
24h 0 · 30d 2
Beneficiaries
Decreasing
24h 0 · 30d 1

These indicators compare raw values between windows. They describe direction, not statistical significance, and remain provisional when either window is unavailable or incomplete.

24h
24 hour window
Miner wallet candidate
Rewards
553
Outgoing
0
Beneficiaries
0
Active buckets
0
Redistributed
0%
Coverage
Complete
Most observed rewards appear to remain at the mining address.
Refreshed: 2026-11-01 11:30:16.380353+00:00
Provisional classification
7d
168 hour window
Miner wallet candidate
Rewards
3,849
Outgoing
0
Beneficiaries
0
Active buckets
0
Redistributed
0%
Coverage
Complete
Most observed rewards appear to remain at the mining address.
Refreshed: 2026-11-01 11:30:16.390463+00:00
Provisional classification
30d
720 hour window
Miner or pool
Rewards
11,787
Outgoing
2
Beneficiaries
1
Active buckets
1
Redistributed
100%
Coverage
Complete
Mining evidence exists, but the distribution pattern is not decisive.
Refreshed: 2026-11-01 11:30:16.392522+00:00
Provisional classification