QuaiWhale logo
QuaiWhale
Miner intelligence

Mining behavior profile

0x000465572160e50fe61cd3bebe1dd37fcb2c6145

Compare retention and redistribution evidence across multiple windows. All classifications remain provisional until validated by a human analyst.

Validation statusValidation blocked2 satisfied · 3 pending · 1 blocked
Current assessment

Miner or pool

Mining evidence exists, but the distribution pattern is not decisive.

Decision readiness
Continue observation
High confidence
Why this assessment
Complete coverage
3 of 3 available windows have complete coverage.
3 observation windows
The 24h, 7d, and 30d windows are available.
Moderately evolving
The classification changes across part of the observed timeline.
Beneficiaries decreasing
Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.
Next validation

Observe redistribution ratio, outgoing transfers, and beneficiary breadth until the distribution pattern becomes decisive.

This recommendation supports analyst workflow only. It does not automatically promote the address to a trusted entity.
Validation workflow

Deterministic analyst checklist

Review the remaining deterministic checks before promoting this provisional mining interpretation to a trusted entity.

2 satisfied3 pending1 blocked
Next analyst action
Blockedcritical priority

Complete human analyst validation

Human validation remains pending until the deterministic readiness checks are satisfied.

Review highlighted check
  • Complete human analyst validation

    critical

    Human validation remains pending until the deterministic readiness checks are satisfied.

    Blocked
  • Confirm canonical reward depth

    high

    Additional canonical reward observations are required before relying on the interpretation.

    Pending
  • Confirm multi-window stability

    high

    The classification must remain consistent across additional windows before promotion.

    Pending
  • Confirm distribution pattern

    high

    Continue observing redistribution, outgoing transfers, and beneficiary breadth until the pattern becomes decisive.

    Pending
  • Confirm complete coverage

    critical

    All available aggregation windows are complete and the latest 24h window is covered.

    Satisfied
  • Reach high interpretation confidence

    medium

    Coverage, stability, observation depth, and reward evidence meet the high-confidence threshold.

    Satisfied

Checklist status is generated from cached metrics and deterministic rules. Human validation remains mandatory before trusted-entity promotion.

Behavior stability
Moderately evolving

The classification changes across part of the observed timeline.

Stability score
50%
Comparable transitions
2
Changed transitions
1
Interpretation confidence

High confidence

Coverage, observation depth, reward evidence, and classification stability strongly support this provisional interpretation.

Confidence score
78%
Coverage
40 / 40
Stability
15 / 30
Observation depth
15 / 15
Reward evidence
8 / 15
Evidence

Deterministic interpretation evidence

7 evidence items
Complete coverage

3 of 3 available windows have complete coverage.

3 observation windows

The 24h, 7d, and 30d windows are available.

Moderately evolving

The classification changes across part of the observed timeline.

Limited reward evidence

22 rewards were observed in the strongest available window.

Redistribution stable

Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.

Outgoing transfers decreasing

Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.

Beneficiaries decreasing

Direction is based on the latest 24h window versus the 30d baseline.

Evidence items are generated from cached mining metrics and deterministic comparison rules. Supporting evidence increases interpretability but does not establish real-world identity.

Behavior summary

Deterministic analyst narrative

Rule-based interpretation

This address shifts from miner pool candidate over 30d to miner or pool in the latest 24h window. Its classification changes across part of the observed timeline. Reward redistribution remains broadly stable versus the longer baseline. Recent distribution activity is contracting across both outgoing transfers and beneficiaries.

This narrative is generated from cached classifications and metric comparisons. It remains provisional and does not establish the real-world identity of the address.

Classification evolution

30d → 7d → 24h interpretation timeline

Provisional transitions
30d → 7d
Unchanged
Miner pool candidate→Miner pool candidate
7d → 24h
Classification changed
Miner pool candidate→Miner or pool

A transition reflects different classifications across aggregation windows. It does not prove that the address changed identity and must remain subject to analyst validation.

Behavior evolution

24h activity versus 30d baseline

Directional comparison
Redistribution
Stable
24h 100% · 30d 100%
Rewards
Decreasing
24h 1 · 30d 22
Outgoing transfers
Decreasing
24h 2 · 30d 33
Beneficiaries
Decreasing
24h 2 · 30d 9

These indicators compare raw values between windows. They describe direction, not statistical significance, and remain provisional when either window is unavailable or incomplete.

24h
24 hour window
Miner or pool
Rewards
1
Outgoing
2
Beneficiaries
2
Active buckets
1
Redistributed
100%
Coverage
Complete
Mining evidence exists, but the distribution pattern is not decisive.
Refreshed: 2026-09-14 23:00:44.84232+00:00
Provisional classification
7d
168 hour window
Miner pool candidate
Rewards
7
Outgoing
16
Beneficiaries
5
Active buckets
6
Redistributed
100%
Coverage
Complete
Rewards are redistributed regularly to several beneficiaries.
Refreshed: 2026-09-14 23:00:44.842439+00:00
Provisional classification
30d
720 hour window
Miner pool candidate
Rewards
22
Outgoing
33
Beneficiaries
9
Active buckets
9
Redistributed
100%
Coverage
Complete
Rewards are redistributed regularly to several beneficiaries.
Refreshed: 2026-09-14 23:00:44.842544+00:00
Provisional classification